About AI Insurance Tools

Who's Behind This

I spent over a decade in insurance operations before starting AI Insurance Tools. During that time I watched dozens of vendors pitch "AI-powered" platforms to my teams, each one promising to transform underwriting, automate claims, or slash operating costs by 40%. Some delivered. Most didn't. The gap between the sales deck and the actual product was usually enormous, and figuring out which tools were worth the implementation effort took months of internal testing that most agencies and carriers can't afford.

That's why this site exists. I built AI Insurance Tools to give insurance professionals the kind of honest, practitioner-level assessments I wished I'd had when evaluating vendors. Every review reflects real testing against actual insurance workflows: policy intake, loss-run analysis, FNOL triage, renewal pricing, agency management. If a tool doesn't hold up when you feed it a 50-page commercial property submission, I'll say so.

This isn't a technology blog written by people who've never processed a claim. It's a resource built by someone who's sat through carrier audits, wrestled with legacy systems, and knows what it actually takes to get a new tool adopted in an insurance organization.

How We Make Money

Transparency matters, so here's exactly how this site generates revenue: we participate in affiliate programs with some of the tools we review. When you click a link to a vendor's site and sign up for their product, we may earn a commission. That's it.

This model lets us keep the site free for readers while funding the time it takes to properly test each tool. But here's what's non-negotiable: affiliate relationships never influence our ratings, rankings, or recommendations. We test every tool ourselves against real insurance tasks before writing a single word. If a tool with a generous affiliate program performs poorly, we'll say so. If the best tool in a category has no affiliate program at all, we'll still recommend it.

Affiliate links are always disclosed on the page where they appear. You'll never have to guess whether a link is compensated.

Editorial Standards

Our reviews follow a consistent set of rules designed to keep the content useful and trustworthy:

  • No sponsored content without clear disclosure. If a vendor pays for placement, it will be labeled as sponsored. This has not happened yet, and we're in no rush to change that.
  • No pay-for-play rankings. Tool rankings are based on our testing and documented criteria. Vendors cannot buy a higher position.
  • We test with real workflows. Reviews include details about the specific insurance tasks we tested, the data we used, and the results we observed.
  • Corrections are published openly. If we get something wrong, we update the article with a note explaining what changed and why.
  • Sources are cited. When we reference pricing, market data, or vendor claims, we link to the original source so you can verify.

If you have questions about our process, spot an error, or want to suggest a tool for review, reach out at hello@aiinsurancetools.com.